How AIQMS Stands Out

---

AIQMS combines features from these categories into a single platform. 

Key differentiators include:

• Real-time Quality Management: Actively monitors quality throughout the project lifecycle.
• ISO 9001 Compliance: Built-in tools for compliance automation specific to the construction industry.
• Predictive Analytics: With active quality monitoring, Identifies risks and inefficiencies early to prevent rework and cost overruns.
• Construction-Focused Workflows: Designed specifically for construction, including bid item traceability and field collaboration.
• Easy integration: Designed to integrate easily with commonly used tools like SharePoint.
• User-friendly and Low Initial Set up Cost:  interface designed for quick onboarding and adoption with low set up cost and maintenance fees.
• Publicly available  to contractors, consultant, and private and public agencies. 

Procore

• Focus: Comprehensive project management for construction.
• Similarities: Tailored for construction workflows, collaboration, and document management.
• Differences: Lacks built-in ISO compliance and traceability features for quality management.

 Buildertrend

• Focus: Construction project management for contractors and remodelers.
• Similarities: Project scheduling, collaboration tools, and customer management.
• Differences: Primarily targets small to mid-size projects and lacks robust quality management capabilities.

Fieldwire

• Focus: Field management for construction teams.
• Similarities: Supports real-time collaboration and on-site task tracking.
• Differences: Does not include lifecycle traceability or compliance automation features.

PlanGrid (Autodesk Construction Cloud)

• Focus: Digital plan management for construction.
• Similarities: Centralized construction document access and field collaboration.
• Differences: Lacks advanced quality assurance and lifecycle traceability features.

IBM DOORS

• Focus: Requirements management and traceability for engineering.
• Similarities: Lifecycle traceability and compliance.
• Differences: Targets engineering and regulated industries, not construction workflows.

Jama Connect

• Focus: Requirements traceability for regulated industries.
• Similarities: Lifecycle traceability and compliance.
• Differences: Lacks construction-specific features.

Helix ALM (Perforce)

• Focus: End-to-end application lifecycle management.
• Similarities: Compliance and traceability tools.
• Differences: Focused on software development, not construction.

 Intelex

• Focus: Environmental, Health, Safety (EHS), and Quality Management.
• Similarities: ISO compliance, quality tracking, and risk management.
• Differences: Broader focus on EHS and sustainability, not construction-specific.

MasterControl

• Focus: Quality management for regulated industries.
• Similarities: Robust compliance tracking and document control.
• Differences: Primarily used in life sciences, not tailored for construction.

Greenlight Guru

• Focus: Quality management for medical device companies.
• Similarities: Compliance tracking and risk management.
• Differences: Designed for medical devices, not construction.

 Primavera P6

• Focus: Advanced project scheduling and resource management.
• Similarities: Detailed scheduling and dependency management.
• Differences: Primarily focused on scheduling without integrated quality management.

Microsoft Project

• Focus: General project scheduling and task management.
• Similarities: Scheduling and reporting tools.
• Differences: Not tailored for compliance or quality management.

Asta Powerproject

• Focus: Project management for construction.
• Similarities: Scheduling and resource allocation tailored to construction.
• Differences: Lacks advanced compliance and quality assurance features.